Frederick Gun Shop Owner Acquitted in Federal Trial Over Alleged Machine Gun Conspiracy

Robert Krop, the owner of The Machine Gun Nest in Frederick, Maryland, was acquitted by a federal jury on all counts, clearing him of charges related to an alleged conspiracy to acquire seven machine guns illegally. The trial, which began last week and was expected to continue through Thursday, concluded ahead of schedule, with the jury reaching its verdict Tuesday after approximately five hours of deliberation.

The courtroom was filled with supporters as Krop received the verdict. Following the announcement, Krop embraced his attorney, Dan Cox, and joined family and friends in a prayer led by family pastor Johnny Yoho. Reflecting on the outcome, Krop expressed gratitude, saying he “just knew” justice would prevail.

Krop’s acquittal followed a case presented by federal prosecutors, who alleged that Krop and Frederick County Sheriff Chuck Jenkins had conspired to mislead the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to obtain machine guns under pretenses. Prosecutors argued that the firearms, including FN Herstal SCARs and an FN M249 SAW, were acquired for demonstration purposes but lacked sufficient justification for possession.

The defense highlighted inconsistencies in the ATF’s demonstration regulations and introduced communications with the sheriff’s office and ATF representatives. These emails, correspondences, and testimony from law enforcement officials underscored gaps in the government’s case. The defense team argued that ATF policies lack a clear definition of “demonstration,” which established reasonable doubt, ultimately leading to Krop’s acquittal.

Dan Cox, Krop’s lead attorney, emphasized gratitude for due process, stating, “We’re grateful to live in a country where justice prevails.” The outcome also raises questions about the strength of the government’s case against Sheriff Jenkins, whose trial is set for January.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office declined to comment on the verdict, while Jenkins’ attorney suggested the case against the sheriff might also lack substantial evidence.

Subscribe and join our community